A Sindscal Analysis of Perceptual Features for Consonants Produced by Esophageal and Tracheoesophageal Talkers This study was concerned with the perceptual responses of normal-hearing listeners to consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal (TE) talkers and a single talker who was proficient in both of these alaryngeal speech modes. The listeners' perceptual responses were analyzed using Symmetric Individual Differences Scaling (SINDSCAL) to determine whether distinctive ... Research Article
Research Article  |   November 01, 1990
A Sindscal Analysis of Perceptual Features for Consonants Produced by Esophageal and Tracheoesophageal Talkers
 
Author Notes
Article Information
Research Article   |   November 01, 1990
A Sindscal Analysis of Perceptual Features for Consonants Produced by Esophageal and Tracheoesophageal Talkers
Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, November 1990, Vol. 55, 756-760. doi:10.1044/jshd.5504.756
History: Received July 7, 1989 , Accepted January 16, 1990
 
Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, November 1990, Vol. 55, 756-760. doi:10.1044/jshd.5504.756
History: Received July 7, 1989; Accepted January 16, 1990

This study was concerned with the perceptual responses of normal-hearing listeners to consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal (TE) talkers and a single talker who was proficient in both of these alaryngeal speech modes. The listeners' perceptual responses were analyzed using Symmetric Individual Differences Scaling (SINDSCAL) to determine whether distinctive feature differences existed between these two methods of alaryngeal speech. This a posteriori analysis revealed that primary features retrieved for both speech methods included sibilant, affricate, dental, nasal, and sonorant. Although greater perceptual weightings were observed for TE speech, these productive/perceptual features were weighted similarly for both speech methods. Some secondary group-specific feature differences were also observed, but these features did not contribute substantially to the total amount of variance accounted for in the analysis. Thus, the SINDSCAL results showed that the groups did not use different feature systems. These results are discussed in regard to the unique alaryngeal speech production methods employed by esophageal and TE talkers and the relative limitations of the alaryngeal (esophageal) voicing source they use. General clinical implications of the data are discussed.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access