Transparency and Recall of Symbols among Intellectually Handicapped Adults The purpose of this investigation was to examine the transparency and recall of symbols representing three parts of speech (nouns, verbs, descriptors) from three different graphic symbol systems (Blissymbols, Picture Communication System, and Picsyms) among adults with intellectual handicaps. Results suggested that the Picture Communication System (PCS) and Picsyms were ... Research Article
Research Article  |   November 01, 1989
Transparency and Recall of Symbols among Intellectually Handicapped Adults
 
Author Notes
Article Information
Research Article   |   November 01, 1989
Transparency and Recall of Symbols among Intellectually Handicapped Adults
Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, November 1989, Vol. 54, 627-633. doi:10.1044/jshd.5404.627
History: Received April 15, 1988 , Accepted February 22, 1989
 
Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, November 1989, Vol. 54, 627-633. doi:10.1044/jshd.5404.627
History: Received April 15, 1988; Accepted February 22, 1989

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the transparency and recall of symbols representing three parts of speech (nouns, verbs, descriptors) from three different graphic symbol systems (Blissymbols, Picture Communication System, and Picsyms) among adults with intellectual handicaps. Results suggested that the Picture Communication System (PCS) and Picsyms were more transparent and easier to learn than Blissymbols. Subjects correctly identified significantly fewer Blissymbols representing nouns than either PCS or Picsyms representing nouns. In early stages of recall for nouns, PCS and Picsyms were significantly easier to recall than Blissymbols. Implications of the data for symbol system selection use for persons with severe speech impairments are discussed.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access