A Comparative Acoustic Study of Normal, Esophageal, and Tracheoesophageal Speech Production Acoustic characteristics of two types of alaryngeal speech were quantified and compared to normal speech production. High-quality audio recordings were obtained from 15 subjects who had undergone the tracheoesophageal puncture method of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation (Singer & Blom, 1980), 15 esophageal speakers, and 15 laryngeal talkers as they sustained the ... Reports
Reports  |   May 01, 1984
A Comparative Acoustic Study of Normal, Esophageal, and Tracheoesophageal Speech Production
 
Author Notes
Article Information
Reports   |   May 01, 1984
A Comparative Acoustic Study of Normal, Esophageal, and Tracheoesophageal Speech Production
Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, May 1984, Vol. 49, 202-210. doi:10.1044/jshd.4902.202
History: Received August 2, 1982 , Accepted October 4, 1983
 
Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, May 1984, Vol. 49, 202-210. doi:10.1044/jshd.4902.202
History: Received August 2, 1982; Accepted October 4, 1983

Acoustic characteristics of two types of alaryngeal speech were quantified and compared to normal speech production. High-quality audio recordings were obtained from 15 subjects who had undergone the tracheoesophageal puncture method of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation (Singer & Blom, 1980), 15 esophageal speakers, and 15 laryngeal talkers as they sustained the vowel/a/and read a standard paragraph. Ten frequency, 7 intensity, and 13 duration variables were quantified. Central tendency and variability measures of frequency and duration for the three speaker groups indicated that tracheoesophageal speech is more similar to normal speech than is esophageal speech. Intensity measures indicated that tracheoesophageal speech is more intense than normal and esophageal speech.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access