Why Not Pivot Grammar? Children’s early attempts at syntax have been described in the recent language development literature in terms of “pivot grammar.” The pivot-open class distinction is discussed in the light of the author’s more recent research that inquired into the semantic intentions that underlie early sentences. When utterances were examined along with ... Forum
Forum  |   February 01, 1971
Why Not Pivot Grammar?
 
Author Notes
Article Information
Forum   |   February 01, 1971
Why Not Pivot Grammar?
Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, February 1971, Vol. 36, 40-50. doi:10.1044/jshd.3601.40
 
Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, February 1971, Vol. 36, 40-50. doi:10.1044/jshd.3601.40

Children’s early attempts at syntax have been described in the recent language development literature in terms of “pivot grammar.” The pivot-open class distinction is discussed in the light of the author’s more recent research that inquired into the semantic intentions that underlie early sentences. When utterances were examined along with context and behavior in the speech events in which they occurred, certain underlying conceptual relations could be identified. It is concluded that the “pivot grammar” account is only a superficial characterization of the form and distribution of linguistic elements in early two-word utterances. It is suggested that a more productive model of early language development to use for evaluation and treatment of language pathology would need to specify the semantic relations among objects and events that are coded by syntax.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access